EFFECT OF FINANCIAL AUDIT ON FRAUD MITIGATION: THE CASE OF GOVERNMENT ENTITIES IN THE COASTAL REGION OF KENYA
Abstract
The public sector has been faced with continued challenges on fraud and corruption related
cases. Most nations have established financial audit systems to test and provide assurance
whether processes are working as expected and that financial statements taken as a whole, are
free from material misstatements due to fraud or errors. At the same time there has been
continued public outcry on the level of fraud cases reported in the public sector in Kenya. In
Kenya, the Auditor General reports have highlighted issues such as lack of productivity,
inadequate internal audit structures, and lack of capacity/skills, inadequate internal controls and
financial malpractices as some of the challenges negatively affecting the attainment of
Government objectives. Kenya losses about a third of its state budget to corruption every year.
Counties in the coastal region largely experience irregularities in financial management,
recruitment, project implementation and procurement malpractices. The effectiveness of fraud
mitigation is arguably a result of a relationship among four variables namely: financial audits,
internal controls, risk management and audit committees. There has been limited studies on the
effect financial audit on fraud in the coastal region of Kenya focusing on the county
governments and the state corporations. The purpose of this study was to assess the adequacy
of financial audits on fraud control, prevention and detection among counties and public entities
operating in Coastal Region. This study was guided by two theories namely: Fraud Diamond
theory and Agency theory. The study used descriptive statistics, correlation analysis and
multiple regression analysis. Primary data was collected using structured questionnaires from
all 33 public organizations in Coastal Region. Data was analyzed using SPSS statistical
package. Reliability test was done using Cronbach alpha and values of the variables in the
questionnaire were greater than 0.700 and thus reliable. Multicollinearity of predictor variables
was tested using variance inflation factors (VIFs) and values of all predictor variables were less
than 10 hence acceptable. The study results were presented inform of tables, charts, frequencies,
percentages, means and standard deviations. Results on financial audits indicated that all
organizations had at least carried out an internal or external audit. About 87% of the entities had
internal control policies while only 58% of the entities had risk management policies. It was
noted that only 48.4% of entities had audit committees. Correlation analysis indicated that
proactive audit, internal Control, risk management, audit committee and size of organization
associated positively with values of 0.749, 0.984, 0.471, 0.793 and 0.722 respectively. Multiple
regression analysis was used to determine the statistical relationship between independent and
dependent variables at 5% level of significance and the value of adjusted R2 was 68.6%. The
coefficients of the regression model showed that internal controls, audit committee and size of
organization are positive and significant. Therefore, the study recommends that public entities
should establish and adhere to internal control policies as well as create functional audit
committees with appropriate skill mix and finally develop adequate administrative structures
commensurate with organization’s size as measures of fraud mitigation.